Comments/Opinions/Suggestions (FYI #107 -
Update on Data Regulations)
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 1999 15:36:21 -0400 (EDT)
From: AIP listserver <fyi@aip.org>
Subject: FYI #107 - Update on Data Regulations
FYI
The American Institute of Physics Bulletin of Science Policy News
Number 107: July 7, 1999
Action Expected this Month on Research Data Issue
Before the end of this month there should be some significant
developments regarding the proposed regulations to obtain research
data. This follows legislation passed last year requiring the Office
of Management and Budget to write regulations allowing the use of the
Freedom of Information Act to access scientific data collected through
federal grants (see FYIs #18, 40, and 86.)
Action is occurring on three fronts. The Office of Management and
Budget will soon issue revised regulations, following its proposed
revisions that were first published on February 4. In that notice, OMB
encouraged "interested parties to provided comment . . . so that any
concerns may be addressed." Usually OMB receives around 200 comments
on a proposed revision. In this case, they were inundated with more
than 9,200 comments. According to one source at the Office of Science
and Technology Policy, 55% of the comments favored the proposed
revision, while 45% opposed it. OMB has completed its analysis of
these comments, and is scheduled to send its revised proposals to
federal agencies this week. The revision should be published in the
Federal Register by the middle of the month.
Do not look for OMB to significantly change the thrust of these
regulations, but rather to issue definition clarifications and to
strengthen safeguards against the release of sensitive personal or
intellectual property information. Note that OMB helped to draft the
original legislative language passed last fall. As things stand, OMB's
hands are tied, as it is required to issue these regulations by law.
It wants to issue final regulations before the start of the next fiscal
year on October 1.
Changing this law is the focus of movement on Capitol Hill. Rep.
James T. Walsh (R-NY) and Rep. David E. Price (D-NC) have a six-line
amendment that they intend to offer to the House Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Bill for FY 2000. This amendment would
prohibit the use of funds under this act to implement, administer, or
enforce the data provision. What would be a one-year delay would be
used to study how to best approach this issue. When that amendment
will come before the full House Appropriations Committee is anyone's
guess. This bill is seen as the best vehicle to pass new firearms
control measures, and so action on the bills is stalled as each side
plans its strategy. Passage by the full committee only puts this issue
on the table for discussion later this year in a House-Senate
conference. Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott (R-MI) was a force
behind last year's legislation, so there is sure to be a struggle.
Opponents of these proposed regulations have long argued that the
proposal was never reviewed by any committee. That situation should
change next week, when the House Government Management, Information and
Technology Subcommittee holds a hearing on the implications of this
proposal. The subcommittee, chaired by Rep. Steve Horn (R-CA), has
tentatively planned a hearing on this matter at 9:30 a.m. on Thursday,
July 15.
###############
Richard M. Jones
Public Information Division
American Institute of Physics
fyi@aip.org
(301) 209-3095
##END##########